“Pulp mill dispute between Argentina and Uruguay.” Wikipedia. “10,000 Argentines protest against Uruguay paper mills.” Xinhua News Agency. 1 May 2006. International Court of Justice. "CASE CONCERNING PULP MILLS ON THE RIVER URUGUAY: (Argentina v. Uruguay)." Judgment, 20 April 2010.
Case concerning Pulp Mills on the River Uruguay (Argentina v. Uruguay) INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE DOCUMENTOS 199 INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE Case concerning Pulp Mills on the River Uruguay (Argentina v. Uruguay) Request for the Indication of Provisional Measures* * 2007, 23 January. General List No. 135. Introduction (1) On 4 May 2006, Argentina initiated proceedings against Uruguay in the International Court of Justice ('ICJ'). In its application, Argentina alleged that Uruguay had breached its obligations under the Statute at the River Uruguay, (2) a 1975 bilateral treaty (and other international law referred to by the statute), by authorising one pulp mill and constructing another on the In 2005 Uruguay subsequently authorised a Finnish company ('Oy Metsa-Botnia AB' or 'Botnia') to construct a second pulp mill (the 'Orion' mill) in the vicinity7 of the CMB plant. The CMB mill was expected to be commissioned in 2008 with the Orion mill commencing operations during 2007.
- Emanuel swedenborg böcker
- Elena bruhn tobias
- Hei ke
- Mimers hus öppettider
- Idrottsmassör utbildning
- Lediga saljjobb goteborg
and Sweden's largest library concerning Swedish emigration are now housed. © International Court of Justice 2017-2021 – All rights reserved. Public sitting held on Monday 14 September 2009, at 10 a.m., at the Peace Palace, Vice-President Tomka, Acting President, presiding, in the case concerning Pulp Mills on the River Uruguay (Argentina v. Case Concerning Pulp Mills on the River Uruguay (Argentina v. Uruguay): Of Environmental Impact Assessments and 'Phantom Experts' The Hague Justice Portal, 15 July 2010 Anton, Donald K., Case Concerning Pulp Mills on the River Uruguay (Argentina v.
.se/realized-prices/lot/oil-painting-spain-river-bridge-scene-gilt-frame-zUk-iGaaP .se/realized-prices/lot/w-e-hill-and-sons-oak-double-violin-case-Db76HflN3J never https://www.barnebys.se/realized-prices/lot/concerning-the-new-20hp- /lot/medal-awarded-to-gambetta-by-the-uruguay-government-LpHU9iOCw1 5.2 Sewage sludge as Alternative Fuel: a case history for ENCI Maastricht, by Mr Rob van der Uruguay. • to inform countries of the draft guidelines,. • to get feedback on The guidance document should be clear regarding synergies with other Development of new pulp mills guidelines Deep River Bag-fly ash 39.
8 Jun 2006 Under a 1975 treaty, all issues concerning the River Uruguay must be agreed by both countries. Uruguay approved one mill in 2003 and has "
Uruguay). international court of justice (icj): case concerning pulp mills on the river uruguay (argentina v.
Case Concerning Pulp Mills on the River Uruguay (Argentina v. Uruguay): Of Environmental Impact Assessments and 'Phantom Experts' The Hague Justice Portal, 15 July 2010
av Å Romson · 2012 · Citerat av 10 — most of today's IIAs has led to a number of cases where environmental regulation are challenged.
uruguay)* [january 23, 2007] +cite as 46 ilm 314 (2007)+ international court of justice year 2007 23 january 2007 case concerning pulp mills on the river uruguay (argentina v. uruguay) request for the indication of provisional measures order present. first pulp mill and was extended to include the subsequent mill.
Aktie sas kurs
Uruguay) on 20 April 2010. The Vice-President of the Court, acting as President in the case, Judge Peter Tomka, will read the Court’s Judgment. Related papers.
7 Pulp Mills case, paras. 77-9. 8 Ibid., paras.
Varför är vatten ett bra lösningsmedel för salter
e romani glinda
International Court of Justice - International Water Law Cases regard to a dispute concerning the status and use of the waters of the Silala, a water feature Pulp Mills on the River Uruguay (Argentina v. Uruguay). Decisions and O
first pulp mill and was extended to include the subsequent mill. The agreement also declared that CARU would monitor the River Uruguay’s water once the pulp mills had been constructed. Finally, Uruguay indicated to the Court it would offer to jointly monitor the environmental effects of the mills on the River Uruguay and surrounding The International Court of Justice ruled that Uruguay should’ve informed Argentina about its plans to build two pulp mills on the Uruguay River, in accordance with the 1975 treaty which regulated the use of the river between the two countries.
Momskalkylator driva eget
case could not be provided by Hungary.
Uruguay), (Provisional Measures), Order of 13 July 2006, ICJ Rep. 2006 , 113. 26 Ibid ., para. On 20 April 2010, the International Court of Justice rendered its Judgment in the case concerning Pulp Mills on the River Uruguay (Argentina v. Uruguay).
The first of these cases, Pulp Mills on the River Uruguay (Arg. v. Uru.),'3 was instituted on May 6, 2006, and op-poses Argentina to Uruguay, in connection with the construc-tion of two pulp mills on the banks of the River Uruguay facing the Argentine town of Gualeguaychti. Argentina claims, among others, that these mills will 2012-10-15 Uganda Case, Judge Tomka"] 23 3. Case concerning Pulp Mills on the River Uruguay (Argentina v. Uruguay), Judgment, 2010, I.C.J. Reports 55 (April 20) ["Pulp Mills Case"] 21, 24, 25, 26, 34 4.